African Sovereign Debt Justice Network (AfSDJN)

Zimbabwe remains ensnared in a profound sovereign debt crisis that hinders its economic recovery and sustainable development. The country's debt overhang continues to undermine fiscal stability, with the national debt surpassing US$20 billion. Despite pledges of commitment to debt clearance, Zimbabwe’s efforts are slow and encumbered by internal and external challenges, including controversial domestic reforms and complex international relations. This update delves into the ongoing struggles in Zimbabwe’s re-engagement efforts as it seeks to manage its debt crisis while navigating international financial obligations and domestic reforms.

To better address the recurrent sovereign debt crisis many developing countries are facing, the proposals contained in the FfD4 Zero Draft need to be strengthened. This is because proposals to address the debt crisis must recognize that is not an aberration but rather an integral feature of the global financial and debt architecture. The Zero Draft needs to abandon the assumption that the primary reason for this indebtedness is that developing countries have overborrowed. Instead, the proposals in the Zero Draft need to take into account that the debt crisis is symptomatic of deeper structural features and weaknesses both of the global financial and debt architecture as well as of the economies of these indebted countries.

My comments focus on Chapter II on Domestic and Financial Private Business and Finance. I will focus on the proposals relating to domestic financial sector, enabling environments and access to financing in paragraphs 31, 33 and 34 of the Zero Draft. My overall comment is that these proposals are a wish list for foreign investors not proven avenues of raising financings.

Ghana’s debt situation underscores the critical need for comprehensive domestic legal and policy measures to enhance debt sustainability, strengthen public financial management, and ensure inclusive growth. The new Mahama administration must prioritize systemic reforms that align fiscal policies with long-term economic stability and development goals. More importantly, it must push for the expediting of the debt restructuring efforts under the G20 Common Framework. Over and above, Ghana’s experience, together with those of Zambia and Ethiopia, continue to expose the inadequacies of the Common Framework, demonstrating the need for a new comprehensive, fair, and effective sovereign debt restructuring system based in the United Nations, and that is binding on all creditors, including commercial creditors.

The African Sovereign Debt Justice Network, (AfSDJN), is a coalition of citizens, scholars, civil society actors and church groups committed to exposing the adverse impact of unsustainable levels of African sovereign debt on the lives of ordinary citizens. Convened by Afronomicslaw.org with the support of Open Society for Southern Africa, (OSISA), the AfSDJN's activities are tailored around addressing the threats that sovereign debt poses for economic development, social cohesion and human rights in Africa. It advocates for debt cancellation, rescheduling and restructuring as well as increasing the accountability and responsibility of lenders and African governments about how sovereign debt is procured, spent and repaid.

The African Sovereign Debt Justice Network, (AfSDJN), is a coalition of citizens, scholars, civil society actors and church groups committed to exposing the adverse impact of unsustainable levels of African sovereign debt on the lives of ordinary citizens. Convened by Afronomicslaw.org with the support of Open Society for Southern Africa, (OSISA), the AfSDJN's activities are tailored around addressing the threats that sovereign debt poses for economic development, social cohesion and human rights in Africa. It advocates for debt cancellation, rescheduling and restructuring as well as increasing the accountability and responsibility of lenders and African governments about how sovereign debt is procured, spent and repaid.

Between 2013 and 2016, three Mozambican government-controlled enterprises discreetly borrowed $2 billion from major international banks to buy a tuna-fishing fleet and surveillance vessels. Mozambique’s then finance minister, Manuel Chang, signed guarantees that the government would repay the loans, which were critical reassurance to lenders who would otherwise have avoided the brand-new enterprises. The companies defaulted on the loans, leaving Mozambique with a $2 billion debt, about 12% of the nation’s gross domestic product at the time. A country that the World Bank had designated one of the world’s 10 fastest-growing economies for two decades was abruptly plunged into financial upheaval. The scandal was only uncovered in 2016 after Mozambique defaulted on these hidden debts, prompting the International Monetary Fund and international donors to halt funding and plunging the country into an economic crisis. The case of the Republic of Mozambique v. Credit Suisse International and others [2024] dated July 29, 2024 and heard in the High Court of England and Wales (Commercial Court) has reinvigorated the prospect of pursuing justice in foreign courts, especially in cases involving complex international financial misconduct and irresponsible lending practices.

The African Sovereign Debt Justice Network, (AfSDJN), is a coalition of citizens, scholars, civil society actors and church groups committed to exposing the adverse impact of unsustainable levels of African sovereign debt on the lives of ordinary citizens. Convened by Afronomicslaw.org with the support of Open Society for Southern Africa, (OSISA), the AfSDJN's activities are tailored around addressing the threats that sovereign debt poses for economic development, social cohesion and human rights in Africa. It advocates for debt cancellation, rescheduling and restructuring as well as increasing the accountability and responsibility of lenders and African governments about how sovereign debt is procured, spent and repaid.